#QNAP UDP TRAFFIC UNREPLIED DOWNLOAD#

If that falls, then allow all UDP, not TCP. So what is going on? Am I doing something wrong with UDP NAT? I want DNS proxy listen on 0.0.0.0 or and transparently proxy my Linux host's DNS queries. Allow all TCP ports and UDP ports, from all IPs. TCP reply packet always correctly SNATed. All of the data on the selected disks will be deleted. Click Finish > OK to create the new encrypted volume. Check Encryption, enter the encryption settings, and click Next. While TCP doesn't encounter such issue ( dnscrypt-proxy also serves TCP). Set the Snapshot Protection Settings if the volume type is between Thick Multiple Volume and Thin Multiple volume (single type does not support Snapshots). udp 17 30 src=::1 dst=::1 sport=39482 dport=39482 src=::1 dst=::1 sport=39482 dport=39482 NAS, SAN y DAS.QNAP, cuya denominación deriva de 'Quality Network Appliance Provider' ('Proveedor de aplicaciones de red de calidad'), es una empresa dedicad. And dig and nslookup can get reply from transparent DNS proxy. I saw on wireshark the reply packet correctly SNATed.

#QNAP UDP TRAFFIC UNREPLIED DOWNLOAD#

Download the Kodi V18 OPKG file from here supported by QNAP QTS. Official QNAP IP remote control or QNAP Q Remote app for controlling user-interface. HDMI-enabled NAS for easy installation via the official QNAP HD Station Application. My browser can't open URLs, and nslookup and dig say: reply from unexpected source: 192.168.3.60#1053, expected 192.168.3.1#53 ( -j REDIRECT is equal to -j DNAT -to 127.0.0.1:)ĭidn't work. Or iptables -t nat -I OUTPUT -p udp -dport 53 -j DNAT -to 127.0.0.1:1053

This is what I found from Internet how we transparent proxy UDP traffic: iptables -t nat -I OUTPUT -p udp -dport 53 -j REDIRECT-to-ports 1053 I wanted to make all my Linux host's DNS queries transparently use that proxy. I ran dnscrypt-proxy or tor on Linux listning on :1053 to server DNS.

Qnap udp traffic unreplied